Thursday, June 19, 2014

PELICAN COVE LANDSCAPING- A PICTORIAL REVIEW OF CHANGES

MOST RESIDENTS AREN'T AWARE OF HOW MUCH OF THE ORIGINAL PC LANDSCAPING HAS BEEN DAMAGED BECAUSE OF MAJOR CHANGES MADE TO THE LANDSCAPING WITHOUT THE RESIDENTS' APPROVAL.

HERE THEY ARE. CLICK ON PICTURES TO ENLARGE. 




















Here are some professional comments on the landscape by Pelican Cove residents with extensive design experience:


“Justin Spring’s eye for beauty, color and proportion is excellent. His commentary on the quality of the changes that have been made to our beautiful landscape is top notch. They’re not just one man’s opinions though; the many photos of each site back him up. We need the advice of a landscape architect if we're going to preserve the beauty and harmony of our Pelican Cove landscape."
Joan Adley, Brookhouse Resident
Art Consultant ; Owner, Adley Gallery of Contemporary Art




"It is my opinion that the use of a landscape architect at Pelican Cove is an absolute necessity.

The use of the computer program we have at Pelican Cove is now interactive with the landscape a
rchitect, Sue Thompson, and Grounds Foreman, Mike O'Byrne, but many others have capabilities to use this program.Justin Spring, who has had a good deal of interaction with the Grounds Committee, is especially adept in the program's usage of knowledge and esthetic acumen in dealing with landscape issues at Pelican Cove. His abilities and consistent interest in the character of Pelican Cove are invaluable."


Don Smith Brookhouse Resident
Grounds Committee Member
Artist
Graduate Studies w/ associates of Eero Saarinen
Professor Emeritus Art & design Rhode Island College




"The main problem we have now is overplanting. As someone who walks the property daily, I can report that areas which used to be open are continually being planted with shrubs making it impossible to traverse where there used to be an open space for the eye to rest, and a space us to walk!

The large ferns can be cut back annually to the base to keep their size in check, but I have never seen this done and now they encroach beautiful plantings all over Pelican Cove.

We really should quit buying plants for a while and focus on maintenance and making what we have more rational. I appreciate the hard work that is done daily here but we should be a bit more conservative in the changes we make.

Helping our staff achieve a more harmonious whole could be greatly aided by the landscape designer.

Lenore S., Resident

Intl. Art Advisory Services, Sarasota
Former owner of Avant Garden Inc.
Former Associate to David Seeler, Landscape Architect,
The Bayberry, Amagansett, New York



What follows is a pictorial review of the
TWELVE ( 12) major redesigns of the Pelican Cove landscape that were made in the six year period: 2006-2011.
(CLICK ON ANY PICTURE TO ENLARGE FOR DETAIL)

The pictures and commentary should be viewed by anyone interested in getting a handle on the quality of these redesigns.

All of these redesigns except one were made without submitting a detailed plan to the residents and the Grounds Committee for approval, something unheard of in the landscape design profession.


In addition, all of the 12 redesigns were made to the original, lush Pelican Cove landscape without the advice and aid of a skilled Landscape Architect.

We estimate that the cost of having a Landscape Architect review and approve any future redesigns of our beautiful landscape would cost only $75-$125 per re-design, which is negligible.

More importantly, it would insure that this our beautiful, one of a kind landscape will continue to be a what Mrs. Wilbanks created 75 years ago: a national treasure.




HERE ARE DETAILED PICTURES AND EVALUATIONS OF THE TWELVE CHANGES
:


CHANGE 1) Planting of over 600 Crotons and Ti plants throughout shady areas in Pelican Cove/ Grounds Manager's Initiative ( 2006)





















Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: POOR


Comments: The main problem is that for Croton and Ti shrubs to grow well, they require full sun ( 6-8 hours).

"The color of Croton leaves is strongly influenced by light intensity.....Landscape varieties grow well in full sun. ... excessive shade will prevent proper color development. University of Florida, IFAS,

"Ti does well in partial shade( 4-6 hours) to nearly full sun ( 6-8hours). It needs more water if grown in full sun.. Although it will survive in quite low light, the foliage will never develop its full potential colors." FLORIDATA


Most of our
Croton and Ti shrubs were planted in shady areas (2 hours sun) with the result they grew spindly and dark in color..



Here is what Crotons look like when they have full sun light and space to grow. They are full, bushy and colorful.


Some of our Crotons were planted in reasonably good light and in groupings in front of the Wilbanks. The result is they look something like the photos below: reasonably bushy and colorful.

















To the left is a photo of what most of our Crotons look like.DARK AND UGLY.












Here is what Ti shrubs look like when they have good light and space to grow. They are full, bushy and colorful.














This is what most of our Ti plants looked like because they were planted singly and in shade.








The problem with our Croton and Ti shrubs is that almost half the Ti shrubs and Croton shrubs were planted in the wrong light ( shade) , where they become skinny and their color becomes dark and muddy. Shade is defined as 2 hours or less of sunlight.

In addition, many were planted in the wrong way ( as single shrubs in the middle of existing shrubs, so they grew long, skinny stalks searching for light only to finally tower above the existing shrubs like alien plants from outer space).

This extreme height difference destroys the harmony of the surrounding shrub area.

In a few years , they will double their height and the problem will only grow worse, because
Ti's grow to 8 feet and Crotons to 8-12 feet.



OUR TI SHRUBS IN BAD LIGHT
Below is what most of our Ti shrubs look like today because they were planted in shade:












Ti shrubs do not grow in well in shady areas. They become stunted or stilted and muddy in color as the sunlight decreases. No landscape architect would have used them in the way they were throughout the very shady areas of PC ( Grovehouses, Glenhouses, Brookhouses, Boathouse Circle).




OUR CROTON SHRUBS IN BAD LIGHT

Below is what many of our Croton shrubs look like because they were planted in shade.





Shade is defined as 2 hours or less of sunlight. The result is they are dark, almost black in color, and skimpy/skinny in structure.

They are depressing, dark colors that have completely spoiled some sections of the Glen houses and Tree houses in the southwest corner of the complex
























Croton shrubs do not grow in well in shady areas. No landscape architect would have used them in the way they were throughout the very shady areas of PC ( Grovehouses, Glenhouses, Brookhouses, Boathouse Circle).



OUR CROTON SHRUBS PLANTED AS SINGLE SHRUBS IN THE MIDDLE OF GREEN EXISTING SHRUBS

Below are photos of single Croton shrubs planted in the middle of existing green shrubs. Even if there is adequate light, they grow tall and skimpy searching for light, eventually towering over the surrounding green shrubs destroying any harmony that existed.

In a few years , they will double their height to 8-12 feet, making the problem even worse.






















BOTH OUR CROTON and TI SHRUBS WERE PLANTED AS SINGLE SHRUBS IN THE MIDDLE OF GREEN SHRUBS

Below are many photos of Ti shrubs and Croton shrubs in Pelican Cove which were planted the wrong way ( as single shrubs in the middle of existing green shrubs) . Some in adequate light, some in shade.

Notice the difference between their heights and the surrounding shrubs..










































All of the Croton and Ti shrubs pictured above destroy the proportional harmony of our green shrub groupings, because to survive they must eventually tower over the surrounding shrubs.

No Landscape Architect would have planted Croton and Ti shrubs this way.

The correct way would have been to mass them together ( in good light) either by themselves, or in front or in back of existing green shrubs where they can grow bushy and full and yet be easily trimmed to the height of the surrounding shrubs.


As an example of the type of color and plant /tree proportion harmony possible with the assistance of an experienced Landscape Architect click here see this video and fast forward to 12:40 thru 14:20 to see how an experienced Landscape Architect has used Crotons harmoniously.






CHANGE 2) First re-landscaping of Boathouse Circle/
Requested by residents petition (2006)
















Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: POOR

Comments: This design was a disaster. The Crotons , Tis and other shrubs that were mistakenly planted would not grow in the extremely shady areas of Boathouse Circle. ( Crotons and Ti plants require full sun, 6-8 hours. They become skinny, stunted and muddy in color as the sunlight decreases. )

No landscape architect would have used them in shady Boathouse Circle.

For more detailed photos and comments see:
http://boathousecircle.blogspot.com/2011/09/boathouse-circle-relandscaping-2009.html

Photos below of area 2 years after this unsatisfactory re-landscaping:



























CHANGE 3)  Butterfly Garden re-landscaping/Requested by Invasive Plant Program  Grounds Committee (2006)
























Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO
Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: POOR

Comments: This design looks like a mash of rangy, skinny Florida Native shrubs that were thrown together.

The Butterfly Garden design called for stripping the plot bare and planting exclusively Florida Native shrubs (except for some ferns). None of the original lush plants were kept.

This was a huge mistake, as they would have balanced out the rangy Florida Native shrubs. This was never taken into account.

(In general, Florida Native shrubs have small leaves and widely spaced branches, as compared to the original lush, broad leaved PC shrubs). Here are some examples to study:




























In addition, none of the Florida Native shrubs resembling the original lush broadleaved shrubs were used. They should have been. If this had been done, and some of the original broad leaved shrubs had been kept, the design would have been much better looking and more in harmony with the surrounding, original landscaping.

A Landscape Architect would have taken into account all these factors and planted accordingly.





CHANGE 4) Brookhouse Pond re-landscaping /Bay and Water Committee project 2006-7 )




























Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting YES/NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: POOR


Comments: The Grounds Committee and grounds manager were bypassed on this site, but the results were equally disastrous.

The site was planted by the residents and members of the Bay and Water Committee after being presented to the Community/Board of Directors as an example of how Native Florida shrubs, flowers and grasses could be planted that required no watering or trimming (according to the company that sold PC the plants). The design was done by the company that sold the plants.

Let me just say that it is never wise to get maintenance and design advice from the company who sells the plants.

Most of the plants died because of lack of water. Some large, brown grasses and large yellow flowering stalks were added a year ago to hide the dead areas.

A Landscape Architect would have set up a spread-out watering schedule to insure the plants didn't die. Most probably a more hardy mixture of Native Florida plants would have been specified as well.




CHANGE 5) Vamo Rd /Brookhouse Re-landscaping / Invasive plant Grounds Committee (2006-7)














Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: POOR

Comments:
Again, this area was stripped completely bare, rather than leave the original non-invasive trees and shrubs that would have balanced the plot out. What resulted looks like a dense bunch of Florida Native trees and shrubs with no apparent design. It is an eyesore.

No Landscape Architect would have done this. The original non-invasive plants and trees would have been kept to balance out the landscaping.




BEFORE GOING ON, HERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON THE HISTORY OF THE ORIGINAL PC LANDSCAPING

Our landscape is a national treasure. It is a completely manufactured landscape in the tradition of Frederick Olmsted, the creator of Central Park in NYC.

Olmsted revolutionized landscaping in America..

Although no one knows for sure, I believe it was originally created for Mrs. Wilbanks by a protege of Olmsted. The two landscape architects employed by Bob Morris in 1978-79 were from the finest landscaping schools and honored the original lush, sub-tropical landscaping in THE ALTERATIONS THEY MADE. 

The result was unique: a condominium complex within a botanical garden.

The Landscape in Pelican Cove can be considered a national treasure.

In  1979, when Pelican Cove opened, the grounds represented a botanical garden equaling Selby Gardens in Sarasota, Fairchild Gardens in Miami, and Bok Towers Gardens in Central Florida.











We believe that the unsatisfactory redesigns of the last six years strongly suggest that a Landscape Architect should oversee and review all future redesigns of the landscape.


The debate as to whether to employ a Landscape Architect to review future designs revolves around 2 considerations::
1. Are the 12 redesigns done over the past 6 years equal in color, beauty and proportion to the original PC landscaping design? These pictures and expert commentary will help you make up your mind.

2. Is the cost of a LA prohibitive? We estimate the cost to be $75-$125 each time a detailed 3D projection is submitted to the LA for review and approval. Again this is NOT for maintenance changes but complete redesigns. If there are no redesigns, the cost is ZERO.

The hourly rate of the LA is $125/hour. It should take no more than ½ hour (or $75) or 1 hour ( $125) for approval by LA since the 3D computer projection of the design can be submitted back and forth via E mail.

A proposal being put before the Grounds Committee asks that a LA approve a design before the redesign can be presented to the Ground Committee for acceptance or dismissal. If it is a accepted, the design can be planted.







CHANGE 6) Interior Grovehouse area re-landscaping/ Grounds Manager Initiative (
2009)





























Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO
Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: ACCEPTABLE

Comments: These large hedges were put up supposedly to keep the worker's carts on the gravel path. That's a manager's job to my mind. Many more hedges ( twice as many) have been planted that will eventually grow as large as those shown.

No residents were consulted. What is in question here is why the re-landscaping was ever done in the first place.

What these hedges really do is block the view of the pool and the other interiors areas which bothers residents.

No landscape Architect would have put up these unnecessary and view-blocking hedges.





CHANGE 7)  Second Boathouse Circle re-landscaping /residents petition/(
2009- 2011)




































Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO ( detailed drawings for islands were submitted by J Spring. Grounds manager submitted none for other areas)

Evaluation of the Design: GOOD


Comments:
After watching two ( 2) years of minimal growth, the skimpy, stunted, non-green landscape was deemed very unsatisfactory by the residents. It was petitioned to be replaced with a landscaping similar to the lush, green original landscaping.

Despite the ground manager's objections that the landscaping was fine, the general manager ordered a re-landscaping of the 22 parking islands to specifications that were drawn up by Justin Spring and approved by the residents

For detailed info and before and after pictures of this see:






HERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ABOUT THE 12 REDESIGNS OF THE ORIGINAL PC LANDSCAPING

A number of artists and designers who live in PC and who are also familiar with good landscaping believe the twelve (12) re-designs that have been made over the past 6 years have degraded that national treasure.

The 12 redesigned areas constitute about 10 to 15% of the total green area in Pelican Cove, depending on how you count the over 600 Crotons and Ti shrubs that were planted in 2006-7.

Based on this, we estimate that an additional 10-15% of the total green area will be completely redesigned every 7 years.


Many residents are not aware of these areas because they are widely separated, sometimes in remote places, and surrounded by the original PC landscaping.

All of these 12 redesigns were done without submitting an accurate, detailed drawing of the proposed redesign to the residents and Grounds Committee, which is unheard of in the landscape design business.

We believe if a landscape Architect had reviewed these designs prior to planting, our landscape would be in much better condition.









CHANGE 8) South end Pelican Cove Fence re-landscaping/Grounds Manager initiative (2010-11)















Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: ACCEPTABLE

Comments: Confederate Jasmine vines were planted to block view of opposing development.

Unfortunately this only works for first floor residents. No trees were planted, as elsewhere , to block the second floor views. A skilled Landscape Architect would have recognized this problem and solved it.






CHANGE 9) Phil Myers Memorial Garden /Grounds Committee (2010-11)












Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: ACCEPTABLE/GOOD

Comments: The three fruit trees were a nice idea as they will grow and bear fruit. however, as a memorial, a skilled Landscape Architect would have also planted some more formal elements to emphasize that the area is a memorial area.





CHANGE 10) Kayak deck re-landscaping Glenhouses/ Ground Committee (2010-2011)














Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design:GOOD

Comments: a nice, clean , functional design utilizing Florida Native and the Original lush shrubs and trees.






HERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ABOUT THE MAJOR PROBLEMS FACING US IF WE CONTINUE TO CHANGE THE ORIGINAL LANDSCAPE AND OPERATE WITHOUT THE ADVICE OF A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.


The basic problem in Pelican Cove at the present time is that two very different types of shrubs were introduced six years ago:


1.Native Florida shrubs







and

2. Croton/Ti shrubs









Both their shapes and their colors are so different from the lush, green, original PC landscaping, that they clashed and no effort was ever made to overcome that clash.


A good LA would have found a way to use these new shrubs in a harmonious way.

As an example of the type of color and plant /tree proportion harmony possible with the assistance of an experienced Landscape Architect see this video and fast forward to 12:40 thru 14:20 to see how an experienced Landscape Architect has used Crotons harmoniously.

Below is an example of some of the clashing colors seen throughout Pelican Cove












The photo to the left shows an example that color disharmony . Starting from back to front: : yellow varigated arbicolas, red/black/purple crotons/ orange-red firecracker ferns.
This combination, especially the yellow arbicolas and red/black purple crotons, is commonly repeated throughout Pelican Cove

Harmony, of course is difficult to define, but everyone instantly recognizes it.

The original Pelican Cove landscaping was created by the best landscape architects money could buy and those who moved here 30 years ago remember that harmony and beauty.




CHANGE 11) Brookhouse front yard redesign/ Grounds manager Initiative (2010 -2011)




















Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: POOR

Comments: 14 out of the 15 the residents of this area complained about this horrible planting, completely out of harmony with the surrounding area but nothing was done. It was ordered removed by the General Manager and the original plantings restored after I intervened on behalf of the residents.

No Landscape Architect would have done this. EVER.







CHANGE 12) Gate entrance Brookhouse re-landscaping/ Grounds Committee (2010-2011)



















Design drawings submitted to Grounds Committee and Residents prior to planting NO/YES*

Design approved by a Landscape Architect: NO

Evaluation of the Design: GOOD






Comments: This was a good design in the sense that as it kept 75% of the original, lush plantings and design while removing only the invasive plants and shrubs.

*The original picture of the design which was submitted to the Grounds committee bore no resemblance to what was actually planted. I asked both IBI and the grounds manager for a picture of the original drawing to back my statements up but neither would release the picture although it is community property. So much for transparency.




SOME FINAL COMMENTS ABOUT THE EVALUATIONS:

You have seen the pictures of all 12 areas. 

CLICK ON THEM TO ENLARGE.

Chances are you aren't aware of many of them because they are in odd corners of PC.


















They will help you judge for yourself as to the quality of the re-landscaping.

The ratings ranged as follows: POOR, ACCEPTABLE, GOOD, EXCELLENT, with
EXCELLENT being the kind of landscape design you would expect from an experienced, licensed Landscape Architect.

None of the 12 landscape redesigns was rated EXCELLENT, including the one done by me. (Justin Spring)


What is needed is a skilled Landscape Architect with a good sense of color and harmony to oversee and approve all redesigns of our landscape.

RIGHT NOW, BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE AN EXPERIENCED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OVERSEEING THE REDESIGNS, WE HAVE 3 DIFFERENT LANDSCAPING SCHEMES COMPETING AGAINST EACH OTHER: (1) FLORIDA NATIVE,(2) CROTON/TI, AND (3) THE ORIGINAL LUSH, GREEN LANDSCAPING.

IT'S LIKE A WOMAN WEARING 3 DIFFERENT HAIR DESIGNS. IT DOESN'T WORK

Our future designs can be done in-house, but we believe they must always be approved by a landscape Architect, skilled in beauty, harmony and proportion.
A proposal being put before the Grounds Committee asks that a LA approve a design before the redesign can be presented to the Ground Committee for acceptance or dismissal. If it is a accepted, the design can be planted.

For those not familiar with standard landscaping practices , no landscape designer ever plants a new landscape without creating a detailed drawing for customer approval and review.
All 12 of our redesigns were planted without submission of a detailed, accurate drawing and without the aid of a professional Landscape Architect.

Despite the hiring of IBI last year, that has not been done. Redesigns continue to be made without the approval of designs by the IBI Landscape Architect.

If this continues, we believe the beautiful Pelican Cove landscape will be degraded beyond recovery within the next 10-15 years.


If you feel as we do, you should make it your business to attend every Ground Committee meeting, starting in November 9, 2011, 9:30 am at the Wilbanks mansion.

Without your speaking up the damage will continue.

It is time we all realize we must take a responsible, professional approach to preserving this one of a kind landscape treasure created by Mrs Wilbanks.

Bob Morris assured Mrs Wilbanks that  he would continue to preserve it when he acquired the property. 

We have a fiduciary obligation to continue that pledge.

If we fail to act, this beautiful treasure will continue to degrade until there will be little left of its original majesty, beauty and harmony.


Justin Spring
for
Friends of the Original PC Landscaping

Click here for Design Credentials of Justin Spring

PELICAN COVE LANDSCAPING-RECOMENDATIONS TO GROUNDS COMMITTEE


These recommendations represent the thoughtful views of almost 100 residents, The Friends of Original PC Landscaping. 













We are concerned with the long range consequences of continuing certain landscaping practices.


Those practices are:

1. HAPHAZARD REPLACEMENT OF AGING TREES

2. LANDSCAPING WITHOUT A SKILLED LANDSCAPE DESIGNER

3. INTRODUCTION OF OVER 600 LARGE, COLORED SHRUBS

We believe if action is not taken NOW to stop them and institute a system of checks and balances, our landscaping will become a hodge-podge within 10 years and there will be no way to recover.

OUR PROJECTIONS:


Our projections of what will happen to the landscape AT THE END OF 10 YEARS are as follows:

A) 100 aging trees will have been cut down before their time, depriving us of a canopy that will take generations to re-grow.

B) Over 2000 more oversized, luridly-colored shrubs will have been planted, ruining the beauty, harmony and symmetry of our existing shrubbery. 

C) 20 large areas will have been re-landscaped in a manner not in harmony with the original landscaping design. These new areas will represent about 25% of the total landscape. Our beautiful, irreplaceable landscape will have become a hodge-podge.

THE LUSH ORIGINAL LANDSCAPING

These estimates are projections based on what has actually taken place over the past 3 years:


1. Attempted removal of 10 aging trees from Boathouse Circle that. were in excellent condition during the last 2 years. 

2. The planting of over 700 large, colored shrubs throughout the shrubbery of PC during the last 3 years.

3. The landscaping of two large areas (Brookhouse Circle/Vamo and Butterfly garden) without the aid of a skilled landscape designer over the past 2 years. 



OUR RECOMENDATIONS

We respectfully submit the following recommendations, which we believe will correct the situation. We welcome any comments or additional suggestions from the committee.



1. REPLACEMENT OF AGING TREES

The Problem: HAPHAZARD REPLACEMENT OF AGING TREES.
Our most precious resource is our trees. They are irreplaceable. A tree removed before its time will take 35-75 years to reach its former height. 

Old trees should only be removed when they are truly old to the eye, and not merely because they have been tagged as “old.”

Once a 75 foot tree has been cut down, it will take 75 years for the new one to reach that height again. 

In replacing old trees, there has been a continued tendency to remove large numbers of trees before they actually have to be removed. 

Many are still in good shape with 5, 10, 15 years worth of life in them despite their “old tree silver” tags.

A CASE IN POINT: The unannounced, planned removal of almost half the trees on Boathouse Circle in Nov 2008 was one recent example of a plan that would have completely destroyed the look of Boathouse Circle with its majestic 75-90’ trees. 

The rationale was it would look better with all the trees being the same 25 foot height. 

Fortunately this was blocked by Boathouse Circle homeowners. Only 5 of the proposed 15 trees were removed.

A good landscape designer would tell you exactly the opposite: that it would look far worse with all 15 trees removed and that both shade and the high loft beauty would be lost for years to come.





OUR TREE REMOVAL RECOMMENDATIONS



A BEAUTIFUL ORIGINAL GROUPING OF TREES
FEATURING DIFFERENT SPECIMENS AT BROOKHOUSE POOL.


1. As far as we know, and as evidenced by the continued confusion at the recent February 19, 2009 Harbor Club meeting on TREE REMOVAL, no concrete plan for sensible removal of aging trees exists at this time. 

We suggest the Grounds Committee recommend the one we are proposing and that the General Manager sees it is enforced. 

2. The Tree Replacement Method That Should be Adopted 

A. Any tree proposed for removal should be wrapped with a red ribbon for 3 months so the residents can examine them. 

That plan should include the General Manager setting up a neighborhood meeting to allow the homeowners enough time to attend, discuss and vote on the proposed tree removal. 

We suggest that an initial neighborhood meeting be set up be set up by the General Manager (using bulletin boards and email) no later than 2 weeks after red ribbons are placed on trees, and that the meetings be continued until there is a satisfactory agreement as to which trees are to be removed 

B. We should also budget a small amount of money each year to plant saplings to replace middle-aged trees that have not yet been tagged. Currently this is not being done. 

 This is the accepted landscaping practice, where new saplings are planted 10-35 years ahead of time so as to provide replacement trees down the road.
This practice should also be undertaken here now. It is not only smarter but cheaper. A sapling at $100 is a fraction of the cost of a $3000 20’ tree.





2. LANDSCAPING DESIGN PRACTICES

RECOMMENDATIONS ON LANDSCAPING DESIGN PRACTICES

The Problem.
Over the past 3-4 years massive re-landscaping has occurred in PC without the advice and guidance of a skilled landscape architect. The PC landscape is an irreplaceable jewel.

If this continues, our magnificent landscaping will become a hodge-podge. This degradation of the landscape can currently be seen in three areas:

1) The newly landscaped areas at the Vamo end of Brookhouse Circle and the Entrance to PC (The Butterfly garden). Any trained eye will immediately see they are not up to the standards of the original landscaping.

2) The massive introduction of over 600 large colored shrubs throughout PC that clash violently with the existing shrubbery.

3) The premature cutting down of aging trees before their time.


Our Recommendations:

Establish a landscape sub-committee of 3-6 members skilled in design and /or gardening to advise the Ground Committee on the suitability of any re-landscaping plans submitted by:
a) an outside landscape architect; b) the grounds manager c) any resident wishing to re-landscape their unit d) any other PC committee





3. COLORED SHRUBS

OUR RECOMMENDATIONS ON COLORED SHRUBS 

The problem: The massive introduction of over 700 colored shrubs (Purple Thai plants and various red and orange Crotons) over the past three years has severely degraded the color scheme, proportions and harmony of the original PC shrubbery. 


SOME OF THE NEW SOME COLORED SHRUBS (CROTONS)

There are currently 742 of these new colored shrubs THAT HAVE GROWN FROM THE 600 ORIGINALLY PLANTED:


Harbor/ Bay houses 182, Grove houses 141, Tree Houses 105, Glen houses 182, Brook houses 132

Here are some hard facts:

1. These new colored shrubs will grow to a height of 8 t0 10 feet or more. Their size will eventually destroy the harmony of the surrounding shrubbery, whose normal height is 3 to 6 feet.

2. There are simply too many of them. 742 colored shrubs is ten times the TOTAL COMBINED COUNT of all the naturally flowering hibiscus, bougainvillea, alamanda, and oleander shrubs currently in PC.


The original PC landscape design used naturally flowering green shrubs (like hibiscus) for color because they elevated the emotions. 


THE BEAUTIFUL, ELEVATING COLOR OF BOUGANVILLEA


3. The new colored shrubs do not elevate the emotions.
Use this simple test: take a small cutting from any Thai plant or Croton and hold it directly against any of the hibiscus or oleander or bougainvillea plants in PC. Then ask yourself the following question: which of these would I bring to a friend as a gift? 

Your emotions will immediately choose the hibiscus or oleander or bougainvillea because their colors elevate the emotions while the Crotons and Thai shrubs don’t.


This emotional depression is very subtle but it is repeated every time you look at one of these colored shrubs. It is an unconscious emotional reaction.

When these new colored shrubs mature in 2-3 years to 8-10 feet and overwhelm the surrounding shrubs, this unconscious reaction will be multiplied.

You can see what the future will look like right now in the shrubbery leading to the Brookhouse pool. (1677 Brookhouse Circle).
In two more years, the rest of PC will look like this. Judge for yourself if this is the look you want in PC. 


This is what happens when changes are made to the landscaping without the advice of a skilled landscape architect.

Our Recommendations:

1. STOP any further planting of these colored shrubs. 

2. TRIM all of these colored plants down to the height of the surrounding shrubs.

3. Introduce future color in accordance with the original PC landscaping plan by planting naturally flowering green shrubs and vines such as tropical hibiscus, alamanda, bougainvillea and oleander.



THE ELEVATING COLOR OF TROPICAL BOUGANVILLEA
IS SUPERIOR


END of recommendations





Assumptions behind 10 year PROJECTIONS

Our projections of the landscape AT THE END OF 10 MORE YEARS are as follows:
A) 100 aging trees will have been cut down before their time, depriving us of a canopy that will take generations to re-grow.


B) Over 2000 more oversized, luridly-colored shrubs will have been planted, ruining the beauty, harmony and symmetry of our existing shrubbery.

C) 20 large areas will have been re-landscaped in a manner not in harmony with the original landscaping design. These new areas represent about 25% of the total landscape. Our beautiful, irreplaceable landscape will have become a hodge-podge. “

Explanation
A) AGING TREES
I based my estimate of 100 aging trees being cut down before their time on the fact that 10 aging trees that had 5-15 years of remaining life in them were scheduled to be cut down in Boathouse Circle in 2009 because no adequate aging tree removal process is in place.

Unless a foolproof process is put in place that involves red ribbons and approval by the residents, I project that an additional unnecessary trees will be cut down each year.

10 trees/year x 10 years = 100 trees cut down unnecessarily.


B) .COLORED SHRUBS
Despite the Grounds Manager’s claim that he had only ordered 600+ crotons and thai plants, I counted 700+. Either way it is an extraordinarily high number to plant. I suggest the Chair get in his car as I did and count them as I did. Two other explanations are as follows: the count on the bill was per pot and not per plant and that some pots contained two or more main stalks. There is no way to tell if it is one or two plants once planted.

My estimate of 2000 more crotons and thai shrubs being planted over the next 10 years were based on the fact that 700 were planted over the past 3 years.

700 shrubs/every 3 years = 700 x 3. = 2100 new shrubs over 10 years.


C) NEW LANDSCAPING
Clarificatiion: I based my landscaping projections on the potential target land area that could be re-landscaped.

I excluded harbor and docks, all roads, sidewalks, nature walks, the mangroves, the wild areas between the Brookhouses and those that border the brooks and harbors. I also excluded the entire Wilbanks Complex ( land and buildings) as they are landmarks and would never be targets for re-landscaping. I also excluded all pools, tennis courts, and recreation centers. What remains is the target land area upon which my projections were based.

Here is a summary of the re-landscaping that has occurred over the past 3 years. IT is a good indication that after 27 years of no change, Pelican Cove is going to be in constant change UNLESS WE PUT A STOP TO IT. :

2007 Clower Creek Swales behind Grove houses
2008 Vamo Rd /Brookhouse re-landscaping ( invasive plant)
Brookhouse pond re-landscaping
2009 interior Glenhouse area re-landscaping
Phase 1 Boathouse Circle re-landscaping
Phase 3 Boathouse Circle re-landscaping
Butterfly Garden re-landscaping ( invasive plant)
South end Pelican Cove fence re-landscaping

In coming up with an average I omitted year 2007 as not being representative of the full forces for change being exerted by invasive plant removal.

Invasive plant removal is a major force behind re-landscaping and is likely to continue to request that new areas to be re-landscaped and thus 2008 and 2009 were better sample years.

An example of this force can be seen in the two areas currently being targeted as containing invasive plants (that I am aware of) :the entrance area adjacent and just west of the Butterfly garden and the interior area between some of the the Brookhhouses.

My estimate of the total 2008-2009 re-landscaping area is that it was 4-5 % of the target land area, thus giving an annual rate of 2-2.5% annually., which I conservatively downgraded to 2%
I did my estimates based on a visually mapping the re-landscaped areas onto the target land area.
Thus my projection:
2%/year x 10 years = 20% new additional Landscape area.

Note: I had based my 25% projection based on initial estimate the 2008-9 average land area change being 2.5% (of the target land area). I decided on a more conservative estimate of 2%, but forgot to change the projection( 25%). A clerical error.